When Can Baby Color Complexion Settle in Stomach
Skin Res Technol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2018 Nov i.
Published in terminal edited form as:
PMCID: PMC5600644
NIHMSID: NIHMS852317
Infant Skin Maturation: Preliminary Outcomes for Color and Biomechanical Backdrop
Marty O. Visscher
oneSkin Sciences Program, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
ivCincinnati Children's Infirmary Medical Eye, Cincinnati, OH
Shoná A. Burkes
1Skin Sciences Program, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
2James Fifty. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
fourCincinnati Children'southward Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
Denise Yard. Adams
iiiHemangioma and Vascular Malformation Center, Cincinnati, OH
4Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Eye, Cincinnati, OH
Adrienne M. Hammill
threeHemangioma and Vascular Malformation Center, Cincinnati, OH
4Cincinnati Children'southward Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
R. Randall Wickett
2James L. Winkle Higher of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
- Supplementary Materials
-
Supp Table S1.
GUID: 0FB1BBA4-4261-4631-B4B0-D77B400BA752
Supp Table S2.
GUID: BC508742-E9D2-4131-A306-8282DC918352
Abstract
Background
Newborn baby skin changes after birth just studies take focused on the epidermal barrier. Dermal properties are relevant for intendance, merely literature on postnatal changes is sparse. We further characterized skin maturational changes in lightness, color and response to biomechanical stress.
Methods
Normal pare sites from subsets of participants in a trial on the progression and phase of infantile hemangiomas were retrospectively examined. Standardized photographs were analyzed as L*, a* and b* images. Biomechanics were measured with the Cutometer®.
Results
Color changed significantly with increasing age. Peel was darker and redder at 2.0versus v.4, viii.5 and 12.8 months. Yellow color increased, with higher values at 12.viii versus ii.0, 3.5 and 5.4 months. Chest tissue was consistently more elastic than arm and confront sites, with significantly higher elasticity for the youngest and oldest age groups. Biological elasticity, rubberband recovery and total recovery were significantly greater for the oldest subjects. Viscoelasticity and rubberband deformation were lower at 5.5 versus eight.8 and 17.6 months. Arm viscoelastic creep was highest at 2.8 months.
Conclusion
Skin maturation continues into yr 2. Increasing elasticity and decreasing viscoelasticity may reverberate increased collagen structure/role. The findings take implications for prevention of skin injury associated with mechanical forces.
Keywords: pare, infant, lightness, reddish color, yellowish color, biomechanical properties, elasticity, deformation, rubberband recovery, objective measurement
Introduction
Full term newborn infant peel has a thick epidermis, well-formed stratum corneum (SC), and low transepidermal water loss, indicating a highly effective barrier (1). Information technology undergoes maturational changes for months after nascency, including a rapid subtract and so increase in SC hydration, decreasing surface acidity with acid mantle development and appearance of functional cost-similar receptors (TRP3, during gestation and postnatally) for innate amnesty (two–5). Infant peel maturation studies have generally focused on epidermal barrier changes.
Objectively measured skin color differentiated disease severity in NICU patients. Infants of high severity had significantly lower b* values, i.e., more yellow colour, than less ill infants (6). Skin lightness over postnatal day 1 was highly correlated with gestational historic period (7). Yellow skin color was highly correlated to serum bilirubin amongst 2441 premature and total term infants and more reliable than visual assessment (viii).
Dermally based peel properties, such as tissue mechanics, colour, and pigmentation, are relevant for baby intendance. The microvasculature continues to evolve for near 4 months (9). The SC and epidermis are 30% and 20% thinner at 6 – 24 months versus adults, with no singled-out epidermal-dermal border (10). Surface dermatoglyphics are denser and dermal papillae more uniform. Premature baby dermis is deficient in structural proteins and hands torn (11). Repeated ischemia and reperfusion from mechanical trauma causes pressure level injuries. For instance, pressure related nasal trauma occurred in 42% of NICU patients using continuous positive airway pressure level and the risk was greater for infants < 32 weeks gestational age (12). Implementation of strategies to forbid pressure level injuries is a loftier priority in pediatric care.
Dermal fibrous collagen and elastin networks, epidermis and subcutaneous tissue give ascension to the biomechanical properties of skin. When measured with suction device and 6 mm probe, they are due to the dermis (thirteen). Holding ratios, such as biological elasticity (Ur/Uf), are thickness independent (14). In adults, biomechanical properties vary with body site and age (15–17). Elasticity decreased over 20 – 60 years, but was lower for 10 – 20 than twenty – 30 and xxx – 40 years (18). Biological elasticity, overall elasticity and full deformation decreased over time and site for twenty–29, 30–39, 40–49, l–59, 60–69, 70–85 years (19).
The literature on postnatal dermal changes is sparse, as most of the structural, histological and compositional research has been on fetal versus developed skin and non on newborns. Nosotros aimed to further narrate infant skin maturational changes in color and biomechanics via a descriptive, retrospective study on normal skin from information collected in a trial to assess the progression infantile hemangiomas (twenty–22). The parent trial: a) quantified hemangioma features of color, size, and volume and responses to thermal and mechanical stress, b) evaluated changes in hemangiomas over fourth dimension (age) and with treatment, c) compared quantitative measures to clinical state, and d) established a quantitative database for hemangiomas. Uninvolved contralateral pare sites were measurement controls. The control site data provides an opportunity to quantify changes over time, i.e., maturational effects, in normal baby pare. We report quantitative of skin lightness, colour, and response to mechanical stress over time using standardized digital imaging and biomechanical methods.
Methods
Subjects
The study was conducted among two subsets of patients from the Hemangioma and Vascular Malformation Center enrolled in a trial to quantify the progression of infantile hemangiomas over fourth dimension and relative to clinical stage (20–22). The Institutional Review Board approved the protocol and parents/guardians provided written informed consent.
Experimental Design
Per the parent trial, subjects had peel evaluations at scheduled dispensary visits, typically every 1–ii weeks to establish therapeutic dose, and so every i–2 months followed by longer intervals. Uninvolved skin sites contralateral to the hemangioma were examined.
Color Imaging and Assay
Subjects acclimated to room weather for at to the lowest degree 15 minutes and were maintained in a at-home state. Loftier resolution digital color images were nerveless at thirty cm perpendicular to the contralateral uninvolved peel site (Nikon D90 12.3 megapixels, Micro Nikkor 60-mm lens, cantankerous polarization, and Nikon R1 Wireless Shut-Up flash, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Nippon) (23). Images were taken with standardized weather condition (lighting, subject position), at a fixed distance, and with polarized low-cal (24) and standardized for white residuum and color (23). Images were colour corrected (Macbeth colour menu), converted from RGB (to CIELab color space, and separated into Fifty* (dark-light), a* (dark-green-cherry) and b* (blueish-yellow) channel images (ImageJ, NIH, Washington, DC, U.s.a.) (23). Mean lightness, ruby-red color and xanthous colour values were reported on 0 – 255 intensity scales.
Biomechanical Properties
Biological elasticity (Ur/Uf), overall elasticity (Ua/Uf), cyberspace elasticity (Ur/Ue), viscoelasticity (Uv/Ue), rubberband recovery (Ur), residual deformation (R), total recovery (Ua), viscoelastic creep (Uv), elastic deformation (Ue), and full deformation (Uf) were measured with a Cutometer® 575 (Backbone & Khazaka electronic GmbH, Koln, Deutschland), half dozen-mm probe discontinuity, 2 second 200 mbar negative pressure and ii 2d relaxation.
Statistical Analysis
Pare lightness, red color, and yellowish color were analyzed over five fourth dimension points (mean age at evaluation) with univariate general linear models (GLM) with p < 0.05 (SPSS v21, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) with regards to handling. Biomechanical properties were evaluated in ii ways: (1) by body site, with treatment and/or age in the model and (2) over time (hateful age at evaluation) by body site. Mail service-hoc pairwise comparisons were made using the least pregnant difference. The relationships between tissue properties and age were examined with correlation methods.
Results
Subjects
For hemangioma trial subjects (north = 119), the number of clinic visits (measurement sessions) varied with treatment plan. The youngest subjects with multiple visits were selected to fairly assess maturational changes. The sites, dictated past the hemangioma locations, were breast, leg, arm, back and face.
Skin Color – Furnishings Over Time
Peel colour over time was evaluated for 16 subjects and 21 sites, with a median of four visits per subject field (range 2–5) to generate 79 color measurements. Mean ages were 2.0 ± 0.5 months at visit 1 to 12.8 ± 2.one months at visit five (Table i). There were 12 females and 4 males, reflecting the female person-predominant occurrence of hemangiomas (25). The majority (n = 13) received oral propranolol, one had topical timolol and two were untreated.
Table 1
Demographic Characteristics: Colour Features by Age at Visit
| Visit | Number of Evaluations | Age (Months) Mean ±SD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | ii.0 ± 0.05 |
| 2 | 18 | 3.five ± 0.06 |
| 3 | 17 | v.iv ± 0.05 |
| iv | 13 | 8.v ± 1.0 |
| five | ten | 12.8 ± ii.1 |
| Total | 79 | --- |
Pare lightness (L) increased, scarlet color (a*) decreased, and yellow color (b*) increased, i.e., bluish color decreased. The skin was lighter at 12.eight versus 2.0 and three.five months and at 5.4 and 8.five versus ii.0 months (F = iii.6, p = 0.009) (Figure 1a). Scarlet color was higher at 2.0 months than any other time and college at 2.0 and iii.5 versus 12.eight months (F = 5.6, p = 0.001) (Effigy 1b). Yellow color was lower at two.0 and 3.5 versus 5.4 and 12.8 months and lower at 5.4 than 12.8 months (F = 9.2, p < 0.001) (Figure 1c).
Skin Color by Age Grouping
L values were higher, indicating lighter skin, at 12.8 versus 2.0 and iii.5 months and at 5.4 and viii.five versus two.0 months (F = iii.six, p = 0.009) (Effigy 1a). Ruddy color was higher at 2.0 months than any other fourth dimension and higher at 2.0 and iii.5 versus 12.eight months (F = 5.half dozen, p = 0.001) (Effigy 1b). Yellow colour was lower at two.0 and 3.five versus 5.4 and 12.eight months and lower at 5.iv than 12.viii months (F = 9.ii, p < 0.001) (Figure 1c).
Biomechanical Properties
Subjects and Analysis Strategy
Biomechanical properties could not be adamant at every visit due to subject area intolerance of the procedure on occasion. Subjects with a least 2 visits were included. There were 28 subjects and 31 sites with iii visits per subject field (median, range 2–6) yielding 98 evaluations. There were eighteen females and 10 males. 18 received propranolol, 3 had timolol and 7 were untreated.
Initially, the event of trunk site was adamant using all evaluations and age equally a covariate (GLM). The sites differed significantly (p < 0.05) for biological elasticity (Ur/Uf), overall elasticity (Ua/Uf), internet elasticity (Ur/Ue), elastic recovery (Ur), and total recovery (Ua) (information non shown). As pairwise comparisons showed no differences for (a) breast versus leg and (b) arm versus back, site data were combined.
The information were grouped by age at assessment, originally into five categories to marshal with ages for the color evaluations. Due to limited observations for the youngest group (less than 3 months), the data were distributed in iv groups. Mean ages were iii.1 ± 0.9 months (youngest) to 16.6 ± 3.4 months (oldest group) (Tabular array two). As expected from the study design, sample sizes varied past site and age group (Tabular array ii).
Table 2
Hateful Group Ages and Number of Evaluations by Body Site
| Group | Age in Months hateful ± SD (range) | Chest | Arm | Face | Total past Age |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| one | 3.1 ± 0.9 (i.5 – 4.3) | 6 | 18 | 8 | 32 |
| 2 | 5.5 ± 0.6 (4.6 – six.8) | 8 | 9 | viii | 25 |
| 3 | 8.8 ± ane.6 (7.0 – 12.1) | 12 | 12 | 4 | 28 |
| 4 | 16.6 ± iii.4 (12.6 – 22.0) | 5 | 3 | five | 13 |
| Total by Site | ---- | 31 | 42 | 25 | 98 |
Effect of Site by Age Group
Biomechanical properties differed by site (Supplementary Table ane). (1) At 3.1 months, biological elasticity (Ur/Uf) was significantly higher for chest versus arm and face up (Figure 2a). Net elasticity (UrUe) and elastic recovery (Ur) were higher for chest versus face. Viscoselasticity (Uv/Ue) and viscoelastic creep (Uv) were higher for arm than confront. (ii) Chest, arm and face sites were not unlike at 5.v months. (3) Total recovery (Ua) at 8.8 months was college for breast than arm and face (Figure 2b) while elastic recovery (Ur), rubberband deformation (Ue) and full deformation (Uf) were college for breast versus arm. (4) For 16.6 months, total recovery (Ua) differed significantly for all sites, i.e., highest for chest and lowest for face (Figure 2b). Biological elasticity (Ur/Uf), net elasticity (Ur/Ue), and elastic recovery (Ur) were higher for chest than arm and face. Overall elasticity (Ua/Uf) was college at both chest and arm than face. Elastic (Ue) and full (Uf) deformation were higher at chest versus face up.
Biomechanical Properties for Skin Sites past Mean Group Age.
Fig 2a. Biological elasticity (Ur/Uf) was significantly higher at the breast versus arm and face at three.ane and 16.6 months. # Indicates significantly higher biological elasticity for chest versus arm and face sites. Fig 2b. Total recovery (Ua) was significantly college for chest versus face at 8.viii months. All sites differed at 16.six months with the highest values for chest and lowest for face. b. *Indicates all sites unlike . # Indicates significantly higher biological elasticity for chest versus arm and face sites.
Effect of Age by Site
Biomechanical properties differed significantly with age (Supplementary Table 2). (1) For breast sites, biological elasticity (Ur/Uf), elastic recovery (Ur) and full recovery (Ua) were significantly college at 16.6 months versus 3.1, v.five and 8.viii months. Viscoelasticity (Uv/Ue) was college at 5.5 than three.one, 8.8 and sixteen.half-dozen months. Elastic deformation (Ue) was lower at 5.five than 16.6 months. (ii) For arm sites, just viscoelastic creep (Uv) differed significantly, with lower values at 5.5 and 8.viii months versus 3.i months. (3) Face up site biomechanical properties did non vary with age.
Moderate, significant positive correlations were found with age for chest site elastic recovery (Ur) (Figure three), biological elasticity (Ur/Uf), total recovery (Ua), elastic deformation (Ue), net elasticity (Ur/Ue) and total deformation (Uf) (Table three). Age correlated negatively to viscoelastic creep (Uv) for arm sites.
Chest Site Elastic Recovery Versus Historic period.
Moderate, pregnant positive correlations were found with age and some of the biomechanical properties. The relationship for chest site elastic recovery (Ur) is shown hither.
Tabular array 3
Age correlations with skin biomechanical backdrop
| Parameter | Site | r | p-value | due north |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elastic recovery Ur | Chest | 0.58 | 0.001 | 31 |
| Total recovery Ua | Chest | 0.50 | 0.004 | 31 |
| Biological elasticity Ur/Uf | Breast | 0.50 | 0.004 | 31 |
| Elastic deformation Ue | Chest | 0.49 | 0.005 | 31 |
| Full deformation Uf | Chest | 0.44 | 0.014 | 31 |
| Net elasticity Ur/Ue | Chest | 0.40 | 0.025 | 31 |
| Viscoelastic creep Uv | Arm | -0.56 | < 0.001 | 42 |
Word
Newborn infants rely on their skin to provide structural integrity, resistance to mechanical trauma, thermal regulation, and sensory transduction, amid other functions. The written report results demonstrate functional pare maturation during neonatal and young infancy, standing into the second twelvemonth. To our knowledge, this is the commencement study describing changes in skin color and biomechanics over the first years of life.
Nosotros retrospectively examined normal sites among a subset of infants aged 1.3 to 16.nine months from a clinical trial to quantify hemangioma progression and clinically adamant stage (20). Infants had darker skin at 2.0 months than at 5.4, 8.5 and 12.8 months (Figure 1a). Red colour was higher at 2.0 months than whatever other time (Effigy 1b). Yellow colour increased, with higher values at 12.eight versus 2.0, 3.5 and v.4 months (Figure 1c).
Previous reports indicated varying skin colour over 25–44 weeks gestational age. The dark red color in premature infants was attributed to blood and vasculature visible through sparse, translucent skin, changing to pink equally thickness increased (26). Pigmentation decreased as gestational age increased from 37 to 42 weeks (27). Farther increases over postnatal days 25–75 were observed only in African American premature infants (28). Ultraviolet-induced pigmentation was very low for 6 – 24 month infants during their start summer but significantly higher a year later, suggesting darkening over the flow (29). Hemoglobin was not measured, merely levels are by and large constant for our historic period range (xxx) and non likely a cause of college redness at ii months. By confocal light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation scanning microscopy, infant skin had an intricate microvasculature network iv–7 days afterward birth that was progressively farther from the pare surface over 1, three and 6 months (31). Vasculature closer to the peel surface may account for the higher red color at 2.0 months.
Tissue response to mechanical stress varied significantly with body site. Chest tissue was consistently more elastic than arm and confront sites and significantly higher for the youngest and oldest historic period groups (Figure 2, Table 3, Supplementary Table ane, ii). Our college Ur/Uf for chest versus arm and face up are mostly consistent with reports for adults, i.e., higher at abdomen, thigh and upper arm versus back and lowest at forehead (16, 19). However, Ur/Uf was significantly lower in older versus younger adults at forearm and back (16). Elasticity was significantly college at chest sites versus forearm, hand and finger in normal adults (32). Significantly higher elasticity, viscoleasticity and extensibility occurred in females aged 25–64 years for the neck versus cheek and forearm (ventral) (33). Elasticity was related (negatively) to historic period for the neck only.
We observed significant effects of historic period group, especially for the chest, with greater biological elasticity (Figure 2a), elastic recovery and full recovery (Effigy 2b) for the oldest subjects. In contrast, viscoelasticity and elastic deformation were lower for the younger grouping at 5.5 compared to 8.8 and 17.half dozen months (Supplementary Tabular array 2). The arm site reflected less rubberband skin, i.eastward., greater viscoelastic creep, for the youngest infants at 2.8 months versus those of 5.5 and 9.iii months (Supplementary Table 2).
Collectively, the findings suggest that baby skin becomes more than elastic by the second year and is more than viscoelastic in early infants, i.e., first 3–four months. However, body site significantly influences tissue biomechanics. The generally college values for the breast permitted differentiation with historic period. Comparative studies are thin equally previous reports have largely focused on older subjects. Our results are consistent with a written report of significantly greater skin elongation/extensibility in infants (< 12 months) than any other age group, i.due east., 1–ii, iii–v, 6–8, ix–xi, 12–14, 15–19, xx–29, 30–40 and > 50 years (34). The pare tension/extension ratio decreased initially from ~ ii – 10 years, with lowest values for fifteen – 25 years, then increased (ii – 67 years) (35). Skin thickness at the shoulder (deltoid) increased from one.six mm at 2 months to i.84 mm at half-dozen months (36). By confocal microscopy, dermal papillae were non visible at 4–vii days but developed during the beginning three months, suggesting a more complex dermal structure (31). Our increases in chest Ur, Ua, and Ue and reduction in arm Uv with increasing historic period may exist impacted by maturational changes in skin thickness and structure.
Our increases in biological elasticity (Ur/Uf) may reflect elevation in collagen, since the reported changes in reticular collagen parallel the alterations in Ur/Uf. Neonatal dermis is "between" fetal and adult for fiber bundle thickness, size and composition (37). Less structured fetal/neonatal dermis has college jail cell differentiation and higher turnover rate than adults (38). Low full collagen is sustained for 10–15 postnatal days (rat model), suggesting persistence of fetal forms (39). Fibrous connective tissue is produced in large quantities after nascence (40). Collagen increases quickly from nativity to month two, further to one yr and decreases by 2 years (41). Babe collagen bundles are less dumbo than adults (42). During development and activity, mechanical forces experienced by the skin are converted to biochemical reactions via mechanotransduction (43). Mechanical stress increases dermal collagen fibril bore and decreases fibril density versus not-stressed peel without irresolute dermal thickness (44). It is possible that mechanotransduction facilitates dermal maturation postnatally.
Nearly 80% of the NICU pressure level injuries were due to pressure from medical devices and occurred four–6 weeks later admission, i.eastward. in ages comparable to our youngest subjects (45). The reduced biological elasticity, elastic recovery, and total recovery in the youngest subjects may prevent restoration from repeated pressure cycles and thereby increment pressure injury adventure. The in vivo biomechanical information from this written report may heighten finite element models for device-related stress since current models are from animal measurements due to lack of human being information (46).
Specific features of this study were noteworthy, as they emphasize potential limitations. The frequency and fourth dimension between evaluations were non standardized, i.east., dictated by treatment plan versus consistent intervals. This variation necessitated nomenclature into historic period strata to assess effects over time. Consequently, the groups were equanimous of different private subjects. Hemangioma treatment effects on uninvolved sites are unknown, therefore, it was included in the statistical model. Furthermore, location of the skin sites varied past age and number of evaluations. We analyzed the data in ii ways in an try to command for site and age. Nosotros were unable to mensurate pare thickness. Noninvasive characterization of skin thickness, composition and construction, e.g., confocal microscopy is warranted to fully explain the observed maturational changes in thickness-dependent properties, i.eastward., Uf, R, Ua, Ur, Ue, and Uv.
Nevertheless, the biomechanical response to stress, coupled with quantitation of peel lightness, red colour and xanthous colour, extend previous reports that infant skin undergoes significant development well after birth. Though preliminary, the findings suggest that pare elasticity increases over the first years of life, may go on to increase until immature machismo and then decreases over time. The results have implications for skin care, particularly for hospitalized infants or those requiring treatment of cutaneous lesions. Previous reports showed that color (erythema) differences betwixt capillary malformations, i.e., port wine stains, and normal pare predicted the treatment effectiveness and could guide treatment planning (47). Lower biological elasticity has implications for prevention and reduction of skin damage associated with mechanical forces, due east.chiliad. pressure injury from medical devices (48).
Supplementary Textile
Supp Table S1
Supp Table S2
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the Society of Pediatric Dermatology, American Foundation of Pharmaceutical Didactics Pre-Doctoral Fellowship, Eye for Clinical & Translational Science & Training, and Imaging Research Center. The project was supported by the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grant 8 UL1 TR000077-05. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does non necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
Footnotes
References
1. Cunico RL, Maibach HI, Khan H, Blossom E. Skin bulwark properties in the newborn. Transepidermal water loss and carbon dioxide emission rates. Biol Neonate. 1977;32:177–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Visscher MO, Chatterjee R, Munson KA, Pickens WL, Hoath SB. Changes in diapered and nondiapered infant peel over the first month of life. Pediatr Dermatol. 2000;17:45–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Iram N, Mildner M, Prior One thousand, Petzelbauer P, Fiala C, Hacker S, et al. Historic period-related changes in expression and function of Price-like receptors in homo peel. Development. 2012;139:4210–4219. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Nikolovski J, Stamatas GN, Kollias North, Wiegand BC. Barrier function and h2o-property and send properties of babe stratum corneum are different from developed and continue to develop through the kickoff twelvemonth of life. J Invest Dermatol. 2008;128:1728–1736. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Visscher K, Odio M, Taylor T, White T, Sargent S, Sluder L, et al. Skin intendance in the NICU patient: effects of wipes versus cloth and water on stratum corneum integrity. Neonatology. 2009;96:226–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. De Felice C, Flori ML, Pellegrino M, Toti P, Stanghellini E, Molinu A, et al. Predictive value of skin colour for illness severity in the high-risk newborn. Pediatric inquiry. 2002;51:100–105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
seven. Watanabe One thousand, Ohki Y, Yoshizawa Y, Inoue Y, Tokuyama G, Morikawa A. Maturational changes in skin color of Japanese newborn infants. Neonatology. 2007;91:275–280. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Tayaba R, Gribetz D, Gribetz I, Holzman IR. Noninvasive estimation of serum bilirubin. Pediatrics. 1998;102:E28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
ix. Fluhr JW, Darlenski R, Taieb A, Hachem JP, Baudouin C, Msika P, et al. Functional skin adaptation in infancy - almost complete but not fully competent. Exp Dermatol. 2010;nineteen:483–492. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Stamatas GN, Nikolovski J, Luedtke MA, Kollias N, Wiegand BC. Infant peel microstructure assessed in vivo differs from adult skin in arrangement and at the cellular level. Pediatr Dermatol. 2010;27:125–131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
eleven. Eichenfield LF, Hardaway CA. Neonatal dermatology. Curr Opin Pediatr. 1999;11:471–474. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Fischer C, Bertelle Five, Hohlfeld J, Forcada-Guex M, Stadelmann-Diaw C, Tolsa JF. Nasal trauma due to continuous positive airway pressure level in neonates. Curvation Dis Kid Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010;95:F447–451. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
xiii. Pierard GE, Nikkels-Tassoudji North, Pierard-Franchimont C. Influence of the exam area on the mechanical properties of peel. Dermatology. 1995;191:9–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
fourteen. Leveque JL, de Rigal J, Agache PG, Monneur C. Influence of ageing on the in vivo extensibility of human peel at a low stress. Arch Dermatol Res. 1980;269:127–135. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Smalls LK, Randall Wickett R, Visscher MO. Effect of dermal thickness, tissue composition, and body site on skin biomechanical properties. Skin Res Technol. 2006;12:43–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Cua AB, Wilhelm KP, Maibach Howdy. Rubberband properties of human skin: relation to age, sex, and anatomical region. Curvation Dermatol Res. 1990;282:283–288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Ryu HS, Joo YH, Kim And then, Park KC, Youn SW. Influence of age and regional differences on peel elasticity as measured by the Cutometer. Peel Res Technol. 2008;14:354–358. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Firooz A, Sadr B, Babakoohi Due south, Sarraf-Yazdy Thou, Fanian F, Kazerouni-Timsar A, et al. Variation of biophysical parameters of the skin with age, gender, and body region. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:386936. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Nedelec B, Forget NJ, Hurtubise T, Cimino Southward, de Muszka F, Legault A, et al. Skin characteristics: normative data for elasticity, erythema, melanin, and thickness at 16 different anatomical locations. Skin Res Technol. 2016;22:263–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Burkes SA, Adams DM, Hammill AM, Chute C, Eaton KP, Welge JA, et al. Peel Imaging Modalities Quantify Progression and Stage of Infantile Hemangiomas. Br J Dermatol. 2015;173:838–841. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Burkes SA, Patel K, Adams DM, Hammill AM, Eaton KP, Randall Wickett R, et al. Infantile hemangioma status by dynamic infrared thermography: A preliminary study. International journal of dermatology. 2016 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Visscher MO, Burkes SA, Adams DM, Gupta A, Wickett RR. Biomechanical properties of infantile hemangiomas: clinical stage and effect of historic period. Skin Res Technol. 2016;22:487–496. [PMC complimentary article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Canning J, Barford B, Sullivan D, Wickett R, Visscher M. Use of digital photography and prototype analysis techniques to quantify erythema in health care workers. Skin Res Technol. 2009;15:24–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. O'Doherty J, Henricson J, Anderson C, Leahy MJ, Nilsson GE, Sjoberg F. Sub-epidermal imaging using polarized calorie-free spectroscopy for assessment of skin microcirculation. Skin Res Technol. 2007;thirteen:472–484. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Haggstrom AN, Drolet BA, Baselga East, Chamlin SL, Garzon MC, Horii KA, et al. Prospective report of infantile hemangiomas: clinical characteristics predicting complications and treatment. Pediatrics. 2006;118:882–887. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Post PW, Krauss AN, Walcman S, Auld PA. Peel reflectance of newborn infants from 25 to 44 weeks gestational age. Human biology. 1976;48:541–557. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Grande R, Gutierrez Eastward, Latorre Due east, Arguelles F. Physiological variations in the pigmentation of newborn infants. Man biology. 1994;66:495–507. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Bosschaart N, Mentink R, Kok JH, van Leeuwen TG, Aalders MC. Optical properties of neonatal peel measured in vivo as a role of historic period and peel pigmentation. Journal of biomedical optics. 2011;16:097003. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. Mack MC, Tierney NK, Ruvolo Due east, Jr, Stamatas GN, Martin KM, Kollias N. Evolution of solar UVR-related pigmentation begins as early equally the first summertime of life. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130:2335–2338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Dallman PR, Siimes MA. Percentile curves for hemoglobin and ruddy prison cell volume in infancy and childhood. J Pediatr. 1979;94:26–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Miyauchi Y, Shimaoka Y, Fujimura T, Koike Y, Yatabe M, Nishikawa M, et al. Developmental Changes in Neonatal and Infant Skin Structures During the First half dozen Months: In Vivo Ascertainment. Pediatr Dermatol. 2016;33:289–295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Ishikawa T, Ishikawa O, Miyachi Y. Measurement of skin elastic properties with a new suction device (I): Human relationship to age, sex and the degree of obesity in normal individuals. The Periodical of dermatology. 1995;22:713–717. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33. Kim BY, Choi JW, Park KC, Youn SW. Sebum, acne, skin elasticity, and gender difference - which is the major influencing cistron for facial pores? Skin Res Technol. 2013;19:e45–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34. Sugihara T, Ohura T, Homma K, Igawa HH. The extensibility in human peel: variation according to age and site. British journal of plastic surgery. 1991;44:418–422. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Alexander H, Cook T. Variations with historic period in the mechanical properties of human skin in vivo. Journal of tissue viability. 2006;xvi:vi–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. Saitoh A, Aizawa Y, Sato I, Hirano H, Sakai T, Mori K. Skin thickness in young infants and adolescents: Applications for intradermal vaccination. Vaccine. 2015;33:3384–3391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37. Smith LT, Holbrook KA, Byers PH. Construction of the dermal matrix during development and in the adult. J Invest Dermatol. 1982;79(Suppl 1):93s–104s. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38. Whitby DJ, Ferguson MW. The extracellular matrix of lip wounds in fetal, neonatal and adult mice. Development. 1991;112:651–668. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39. Hallock GG, Merkel JR, Rice DC, DiPaolo BR. The ontogenetic transition of collagen deposition in rat skin. Annals of plastic surgery. 1993;30:239–243. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
forty. Holbrook KA. Histologic and ultrastructural properties of the newborn peel. In: Maibach Hi, Boisits Due east, editors. Neonatal Skin Structure and Part. one. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1982. [Google Scholar]
41. Mays PK, Bishop JE, Laurent GJ. Age-related changes in the proportion of types I and Three collagen. Mechanisms of ageing and development. 1988;45:203–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42. Vitellaro-Zuccarello Fifty, Cappelletti S, Dal Pozzo Rossi V, Sari-Gorla One thousand. Stereological analysis of collagen and elastic fibers in the normal human dermis: variability with historic period, sexual activity, and body region. The Anatomical record. 1994;238:153–162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43. Wong VW, Akaishi S, Longaker MT, Gurtner GC. Pushing back: wound mechanotransduction in repair and regeneration. J Invest Dermatol. 2011;131:2186–2196. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44. Sanders JE, Goldstein BS. Collagen fibril diameters increment and fibril densities subtract in skin subjected to repetitive compressive and shear stresses. Periodical of biomechanics. 2001;34:1581–1587. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45. Visscher Thousand, Taylor T. Pressure ulcers in the hospitalized neonate: rates and risk factors. Scientific reports. 2014;4:7429. [PMC gratuitous article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46. Levy A, Kopplin 1000, Gefen A. Device-related force per unit area ulcers from a biomechanical perspective. J Tissue Viability. 2016 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47. Kleiman A, Keats EC, Chan NG, Khan ZA. Evolution of hemangioma endothelium. Exp Mol Pathol. 2012;93:264–272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48. Visscher M, Rex A, Nie AM, Schaffer P, Taylor T, Pruitt D, et al. A quality-comeback collaborative project to reduce pressure ulcers in PICUs. Pediatrics. 2013;131:e1950–1960. [PMC gratis article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600644/
0 Response to "When Can Baby Color Complexion Settle in Stomach"
Post a Comment